Business Plan CheckPrep KitPlanSamplePricingThe DeskOpen saved work
LendingJuly 28, 202612 min read

Sources and uses table: your lender-ready guide for Canada

Woman reviewing sources and uses table at desk

A sources and uses table is a two-column financing schedule that shows, to the dollar, where every dollar needed to close a deal comes from (Sources) and exactly where each dollar is spent (Uses). Total Sources must equal total Uses, always. For Canadian entrepreneurs seeking funding through a bank, the Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC), or the Canada Small Business Financing Program (CSBFP), a balanced sources and uses statement is not a formality. It is a gatekeeper. Lenders treat it as a litmus test for whether you truly understand your own deal.

Think of it this way: if your table does not balance, you are telling the loan officer that money is coming from somewhere you have not named yet. That is not a gap they will fill in for you.

TL;DR: Total Sources − Total Uses = 0. That zero-balance check, visible at the top of your spreadsheet, is the single fastest credibility signal you can give a Canadian lender. LenderReady’s plan builder puts this check into every plan it generates.


Table of Contents

What goes in the ‘Uses’ column?

The Uses side answers one question: what does the money actually pay for at closing? Typical Uses include:

Pro Tip: Never omit the funded working capital reserve. Lenders see its absence as a red flag, it signals the new owner may face a cash crunch within weeks of closing. Size it at one to three months of your operating cost cycle, and show the calculation in your assumptions.


Hands typing near financial documents on desk laptop

What goes in the ‘Sources’ column?

Sources answer the mirror question: who is providing the capital, and on what terms? Common Sources in Canadian small-business deals include:

Senior debt covers bank term loans and BDC lending. BDC often participates as a co-lender or provides subordinated financing alongside a chartered bank. The CSBFP backs loans up to $1,000,000 for eligible small businesses (up to $500,000 for equipment and leasehold improvements), with the federal government guaranteeing a portion of the lender’s risk. Both programs have specific eligible-collateral rules that affect how you list security on your Sources line.

Infographic comparing sources and uses categories in finance

Seller financing (seller notes) is common in Canadian small-business acquisitions. The seller agrees to receive part of the purchase price over time, subordinated to senior debt. It appears as a Source because it reduces the cash you need at closing.

Buyer equity is the cash you and any co-investors contribute directly. Practitioners use equity as the model “plug”, once all committed debt and necessary Uses are defined, equity fills the remaining gap. This lets you test alternative leverage mixes by swapping the equity plug for hypothetical debt tranches.

Government grants and programs can appear as Sources when funds are committed and draw-ready at closing. Conditional grants that depend on post-closing milestones should be flagged as contingent, not firm.

Pro Tip: List CSBFP and BDC loans separately from conventional bank debt. Lenders want to see program-specific terms, maximum amounts, eligible collateral, and draw schedules. Presented clearly so they can verify compliance without digging through your narrative.


How to build a balanced sources and uses table step by step

Start with Uses, not Sources. Quantifying what you need to spend forces discipline before you start promising capital you may not have.

  1. Set up your spreadsheet tabs. Create a dedicated “S&U” tab linked to your transaction summary, cap table, and cash flow model. Label every row clearly.
  2. Build the purchase price bridge. Start from enterprise value, subtract assumed debt, add cash adjustments, and arrive at the equity purchase price. Link this cell directly to your cap table.
  3. Add fees and reserves. Enter transaction fees, financing fees, escrows, and your funded working capital reserve as separate line items. Each needs a footnote or assumption cell explaining how you sized it.
  4. Enter committed Sources. List senior debt, seller notes, and any confirmed grants with their amounts. Lock these cells once confirmed.
  5. Calculate the equity plug. Set the buyer equity cell as: = Total Uses − (all other Sources). This is your dynamic plug. If it turns negative, your deal is over-leveraged.
  6. Add the model check. In a prominent cell, enter = Total Sources − Total Uses. Format it with conditional formatting: green when the result is zero, red for anything else. An error flag cell reading “CHECK” or “OK” makes the balance visible at a glance.

Assumptions documentation is not optional. Every number needs a footnote: the source of your fee estimate, the basis for your working capital sizing, and the conditions attached to any contingent Source. Lenders should be able to reconstruct your arithmetic without asking you a single question.

Pro Tip: Link your financing fees cell to your debt schedule amortization table, not to a hard-coded number. When loan terms change during negotiation, the S&U updates automatically.


Worked Canadian example: a small-business acquisition

The table below shows a plausible acquisition of a Canadian service business at a $1,200,000 enterprise value. All amounts are in CAD.

Line item Amount (CAD) Type
Equity purchase price $1,200,000 Purchase
Repayment of existing debt , Debt retirement
Transaction fees (legal, accounting) , Closing cost
Financing fees (capitalized) , Capitalized cost
Funded working capital reserve , Operating reserve
Total Uses $1,200,000
BDC / bank senior loan $600,000 Senior debt
Seller note (5-year, subordinated) $220,000 Seller financing
Buyer equity (plug) $200,000 Equity
Total Sources $1,200,000
Model check (Sources − Uses) $0 ✓ Balanced

The buyer equity row is the plug: it was calculated last, after all debt and Uses were confirmed. To adapt this for a higher-leverage case, increase the senior loan and reduce the equity plug, then re-run your debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) to confirm the business can carry the additional debt. For CSBFP-backed deals, verify that the loan amount and eligible asset categories fall within program limits before presenting to your lender.


What Canadian lenders actually look for in your table

A loan officer reviewing your sources and uses statement is asking four questions simultaneously: Is the deal fully funded? Is the working capital adequate? Are all Sources committed? And who gets paid first if things go sideways?

Lender focus area What they want to see Common gap
Funded working capital Explicit reserve line item, sized with assumptions Reserve omitted entirely
Committed vs. conditional Sources Clear labelling of firm vs. contingent funds Soft commitments listed as firm
Security and priority Debt ranked by seniority; PPSA filings noted Priority order unstated
Transaction fee realism Fees consistent with deal size and market rates Fees understated or missing
Draw schedule Timing of each Source tranche matched to Uses Single lump sum assumed

For CSBFP loans, lenders will check that the loan covers only eligible assets (equipment, leasehold improvements, intangible assets, and real property up to program maximums). BDC has its own credit criteria and may require a separate subordination agreement if it participates alongside a chartered bank. Provincial Personal Property Security Act (PPSA) registrations affect which lender holds first-priority security on business assets, your lawyer handles the filing, but your S&U should acknowledge the security structure.

Pro Tip: Attach a one-page assumptions sheet to your S&U. Lenders prefer seeing how fees, reserves, and draw schedules were calculated without combing through your full model. It signals preparation and reduces back-and-forth.


Errors that cause lenders to pause or decline

Quick fix for each: run the zero-balance check after every change, cross-reference each Source to a commitment letter or term sheet, and have a second person read the assumptions sheet cold.


Quick spreadsheet sanity checks before you send anything

A visible model check is a simple but powerful credibility signal. Reviewers notice it immediately, and its absence raises questions about whether you checked your own work.


Key takeaways

A balanced sources and uses table, with a visible zero-balance check and a funded working capital reserve, is the single document that tells Canadian lenders your deal is real and fully thought through.

Point Details
Balance is non-negotiable Total Sources must equal Total Uses to the dollar; show the zero-balance check prominently.
Working capital reserve is a must Size it at one to three months of operating costs and include the calculation in your assumptions.
Equity is the dynamic plug Calculate buyer equity last, after all committed debt and Uses are confirmed, then stress-test it.
Label committed vs. conditional Soft commitments listed as firm Sources are the fastest way to lose lender trust.
LenderReady builds this for you LenderReady generates a lender-ready S&U with model checks and assumptions documentation in about 15 minutes.

Why a clean S&U table reduces approval friction

The sources and uses table is often treated as a back-of-the-plan formality. That is a mistake. In my experience reviewing funding packages, the S&U is usually the first place a loan officer looks, not the executive summary. A clean, balanced table with a visible zero-balance check signals that the entrepreneur has done the arithmetic and understands the capital structure. A messy or incomplete one signals the opposite, regardless of how polished the narrative sections are.

What most guides miss is the storytelling dimension. As PropertyMetrics notes, the S&U is a strategic narrative: a surplus signals distributable cash, a deficit signals a funding gap that needs a plan. Presenting it that way, with contingencies named and a clear path to closing any gap, is what separates a fundable plan from a hopeful one.

For complex deals involving layered security, PPSA filings, or tax-structured seller notes, get a qualified accountant or lawyer to review the S&U before submission. The table itself is straightforward; the legal and tax implications of what goes in it are not always so.


LenderReady gets your Sources & Uses table lender-ready fast

Most entrepreneurs spend days wrestling with spreadsheets before they have a S&U that a lender will actually read. LenderReady cuts that to about 15 minutes. Through a conversational Q&A, it builds a complete, lender-ready business plan that includes a balanced Sources & Uses schedule, a visible zero-balance model check, assumptions documentation, and sensitivity analysis, all formatted to meet Canadian lender expectations.

Lenderready

If your plan needs a check before you submit, the free Business Plan Check names structural gaps without uploading the document. If you are already operating, the Financial Statement Scan adds deterministic ratios and keeps every extracted figure tied to its source. Start your plan at lenderready.ca and have a fundable S&U in your hands today.


This article is general information, not financial or legal advice. Confirm program eligibility, loan terms, and security requirements with BDC, your lender, or a qualified professional for your specific situation.

See where your financing file stands

Fifteen questions, four minutes, no documents and no email. You get a readiness stage, the gaps a lender would raise, and the document list for your request.

Check my readiness, free
← All posts

LenderReady is an educational service, not a lender, broker, or financial advisor. Lending criteria vary by institution and change over time; treat this as a starting point, not a guarantee.